“Post-nature” Sylvania

Dimensions Aesthetic Judgement and Interpretation of Contemporary Parks

Authors

Keywords:

Modified Environment, Natural Contract, Earth Jurisprudence, Post-Nature, Representation

Abstract

This paper establishes interpretative criteria for the aesthetic evaluation of contemporary gardens and parks, specifically focusing on a dendrological park. Initially, it examines the potential of a “contract with nature” as a foundational basis for such evaluation but subsequently challenges this notion. The paper posits that political and material-ecological aspects significantly influence aesthetic judgments in these spaces. It argues that these elements are integral to eliciting a direct aesthetic experience and necessitates explicit explication in their interpretation. This study further interprets gardens and parks as akin to works of art in that they represent, albeit without conventional subject matter, the nuanced relationships to the lives of individuals. The paper elucidates the more profound, often unspoken dialogues between nature, culture, and individual experience by viewing these spaces as representational mediums.

References

Badiou, Alain (2008), Live Theory, Oliver Felthan (ed.), Continuum: London.

Berleant, Arnold (1992), Aesthetics of Environment, Temple University Press: Philadelphia.

Bolter, Jay David & Richard Grusin (1999), Remediation: Understanding New Media, Cambridge, MIT Press: MA.

Brady, Emily, Isis Brook, & Jonathan Prior (2018), Between Nature and Culture, The Aesthetics of Modified Environments, Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd: London, New York.

Castro, Teresa (2019), ‘The Mediated Plant’, e-flux journal (online), September, 102. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/102/283819/the-mediated-plant/ [accessed: 22 July 2023].

Cosgrove, Denis E. (1984), Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape, Croom Helm: London.

Cullinan, Cormac (2002), Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice, Green Books: Claremont, SA.

Daniels, Stephen (1988), ‘The Political Iconography of Woodland in Later Georgian England’, [in:] D. Cosgrove & S. Daniels (eds.), The Iconography of Landscape, Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 43–82.

Demos, T. J. (2015), ‘Rights of Nature: The Art and Politics of Earth Jurisprudence’, [in:] Rights of Nature: Art and Ecology in the Americas, catalogue essay, https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.ucsc.edu/dist/0/196/files/2015/10/Demos-Rights-of-Nature-2015.compressed.pdf [accessed: 27 July 2023].

Ferrari, G. R. F. (2010), ‘The Meaninglessness of Gardens’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 68 (1), pp. 33–45.

Fisher, John A. (2003), ‘Environmental Aesthetics’, [in:] J. Levinson (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 667–678.

Hunt, John Dixon (1971), ‘Emblem and Expressionism in the Eighteenth-Century Landscape Garden’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 4 (3), pp. 294–317.

Hunt, John Dixon (2000), Greater Perfections, The Practice of Garden Theory, Thames & Hudson: London.

Latour, Bruno (2004), Politics of Nature, How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Harvard UP.: Cambridge/Mass.

Marder, Michael (2013), Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life, Columbia University Press: New York.

Serres, Michel (1995), The Natural Contract, trans. E. MacArthur & W. Paulson, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Serres, Michel (2000), Retour au Contrat naturel, Éditions de la Bibliothèque nationale de France: Paris.

Swyngedouw, Erik (2011), ‘Whose Environment? The End of Nature, Climate Change and the Process of Post-Politicization’, Ambiente & Sociedade, 14 (2), pp. 67–87.

Downloads

Published

13-01-2024